Use cases for permission management
Below you will find some examples of use cases in which the konfipay permission concept is used to implement special access rights or restrictions. The additive combination of functional permissions and content restrictions means that practically any special case can be mapped.
Example | User permissions in the permission matrix |
---|---|
User should have full functional permissions, but not be able to see salary payments. Implementation:
→ Functional permissions and content restrictions are additive, i.e. the user receives the permissions from the group | ![]() ![]() |
User should be able to work in the client, but not be able to view all data for the bank account “SRZ Test Coba”. Implementation:
→ Functional permissions and content restrictions are additive, i.e. the user receives the permissions from the group | ![]() ![]() |
User should receive full function permissions, but only be able to see data on the bank account “SRZ Test Coba”. Implementation:
→ Functional permissions and content restrictions are additive, i.e. the user receives the permissions from the group | ![]() ![]() |
Users should not be able to see bank accounts with the tag “Secret.” Implementation:
→ The user can work according to their normal user group, but cannot see accounts/data that have the tag “Secret”. | ![]() ![]() ![]() |